What the court can decide at a repossession hearing
This page explains the decisions the sheriff can make when a repossession action goes to court.
My lender has applied to court to repossess and sell my home
If your lender has applied to court for the right to repossess your home and has sent you a section 24 notice and initial writ and you have opposed the action, the sheriff can make the following decisions:
dismiss the case
continue the case
grant an order for repossession.
The case is dismissed
The sheriff can throw the case out of court if s/he thinks your lender has not followed the correct procedure or they don't have the right to repossess your home. For example, they may not have served you with a calling-up notice or have followed any of the pre-action requirements.
If your lender still wants to repossess your home, they will have to start court proceedings from the beginning again.
The case is continued
The court can set another date so they can have a look at your case again. The court may want to do this to:
allow time for you or your lender to provide more information
monitor payments towards your arrears.
When the case comes back to court the sheriff can decide to continue the case again, dismiss it or grant a repossession order.
A repossession order is granted
This is the worst case scenario. The court could grant your lender the right to repossess your home. An order must be included stating that you have to move out, as the property cannot be sold be with you in it. The lender then has the right to evict you, usually 14 days after the order was granted.
You can still try to negotiate with your lender, but you will need to be able to:
pay a lump sum, and
make an offer to pay the balance of the arrears, and
pay your lender's legal costs, and
show that you will be able to meet monthly payments too.
Last updated: 16 February 2018