Skip to main content
Shelter Logo
Scotland
Skip to article
Search Shelter Scotland site by keyword with filters

Search Shelter Legal

...when suggestion results are available use up and down arrows to navigate and press enter key to select.

Suggestions

    Eviction proceedings for Gypsy and Traveller communities

    Land owners, including local authorities, can raise a heritable property action for eviction against anybody who parks a caravan on land without consent.

    Such an action is raised in the sheriff court under summary cause procedure. No special notice has to be given before a court summons is served and a shortened procedure may be used. There is no defence to such an eviction action. A solicitor may, however, try to have an eviction order suspended on humanitarian grounds. A decree which has already been granted cannot be recalled.

    When taking action, local authorities must refer to the Scottish Government's guidelines for managing unauthorised sites.

    This content applies to Scotland

    Judicial review

    If the action is raised by a public authority, including a local authority, then a solicitor can consider raising a judicial review action against that authority's decision to evict a member of Gypsy and Traveller communities. This would usually be done on grounds relating to the Human Rights Act 1998 or the Children (Scotland) Act 1995, or on the basis of the official toleration policy (if the pitch targets have not been met in the area and if no more than 12 caravans are parked).

    A judicial review action can also be pursued if, by raising eviction proceedings, the public authority breaches its own written policy or a promise previously made to the Gypsy and Traveller communities. [1] Solicitors can ask the sheriff to continue or sist the eviction case pending the outcome of a judicial review.

    Evictions and Article 8 of the ECHR

    Advisers should also note that human rights issues may be engaged by eviction proceedings taken against members of Gypsy and Traveller communities. Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights states: everyone has the right to respect for their ‘private and family life, his home and his correspondence’. [2] The UK courts have held that eviction proceedings by public authorities are an interference with this right and, in principle, defenders should have the right to have the proportionality of the eviction considered at the first calling of an eviction action. [3]

    In the context of Gypsy and Traveller communities it must be established that they have a sufficient connection with the area in which they are living, i.e. where they are living is considered ‘home’. In Brighton and Hove CC v Alleyn and others [4] a local authority was seeking to evict travellers from local authority property. It was held that only nine months was required for the area to be established as a ‘home’ for the purposes of Article 8. This case in an English County Court one and consequently can only be of persuasive application in Scottish courts. Public authorities are not required to considered Article 8 proportionality from the beginning of an eviction action – it is up to a defender to raise the issue of the proportionality of an eviction action. [5] If it is suspected that human rights issues are engaged then advisers should contact a solicitor.

    Eviction without a court order

    An eviction of a trespasser without a court order is not a criminal offence, and does not give rise to a claim for compensation. [6] Land owners may, however, risk causing criminal injury or damage to vehicles if they try to carry out an eviction without a court order.

    Last updated: 25 June 2021

    Footnotes

    • [1]

      R v London Borough of Brent ex p McDonagh [1989] 21 HLR 494

    • [2]

      Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended, Rome, 4.XI.1950 as incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998 (c.42)

    • [3]

      Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45; [2010] 3 WLR 1441

    • [4]

      Brighton and Hove County Council v Alleyn and other [2011] EW Misc 6 (CC)

    • [5]

      Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45; [2010] 3 WLR 1441

    • [6]

      s.40 Housing (Scotland) Act 1988